Our Blog

Featured in ETF.com, Chief Investment Officer Larry Whistler provides insight for one of the most important measures of Fixed Income risk in his article, “It Really Is Time To Understand Duration.”

Capture

 

 

 

As the Federal Reserve embarks on its long-awaited interest rate “normalization” voyage, portfolio managers need to prepare their portfolios for the journey. As passengers on this ship, intended or not, bond holders everywhere will feel the sting of rising rates for the first time in nearly 10 years.

We’ve noticed a certain complacency having set in in the fixed-income arena, with few investors properly acknowledging that, indeed, one can lose money in bonds!

Five Big Bond ETFs

The largest fixed-income exchange-traded funds by assets are:

That’s more than $100 billon invested in those five ETFs alone. Although hardly identical, they all share one measure that investors should be focusing on right now: duration.

To read the entire article please click here.

The Nottingham team joined 12, 375 people within 396 local companies this past Thursday to run the 35th annual Corporate Challenge. The 3.5-mile race this year benefits two widely-respected not-for-profit organizations in the Buffalo community, Kevin Guest House and the Angel Fund at Roswell Park Cancer Institute.CorpChalCorpChal_Nieman_109

Portfolio Manager Christopher Hugar comments for the ETF.com article “Solving the Income Riddle” by Olivier Ludwig.

We suggest investors divorce themselves from the idea that liabilities must be funded by income and income alone. Instead, it’s important to remember there are two ways to generate portfolio returns: either via income or capital gains. What’s more, it’s our view that the current environment has actually skewed return profiles toward the latter, at least in the near term.

Since 2009, quantitative easing has been the response of choice for deflation-fighting central bankers around the world. At its core, QE is specifically designed to suppress yields in an effort to push investors further out on the risk spectrum to reflate asset prices. By their very design, these programs tilt the scale away from income and toward capital gains. It’s suggested that investors shouldn’t “fight” central bankers, and pursuing yield alone in this environment feels a little bit like that.

With the Fed officially ending its QE program in 2014, the United States is now a tough environment for income-seekers and total return-seekers alike. Instead, we suggest investors look abroad. Consider the iShares MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility ETF (EFAV | B-64), which yields just more than 3.0%. Roughly 40% of the fund is allocated to Japan and the eurozone.

Both are areas that have reasonable valuations, and central bankers are still aggressively pursuing QE, suggesting future gains will more than make up for the shortfall in any 5% yield bogey. As an added bonus, the product is even designed to have a lower-volatility profile—a favorable attribute for most income investors.

To read the entire article please click here.

Written by Portfolio Manager Matthew Krajna, The Select Managers Program Quarterly Review is issued to provide color to both strategy and individual fund performance and highlight any portfolio changes that have been made throughout the period.

NASMP Q1 2015 Review

If you have any questions or comments, or would like to discuss any of the NASMP strategies in further detail, please do not hesitate to contact our office at 716-633-3800 or e-mail: matthew.krajna@nottinghamadvisors.com

Nottingham Advisors’ President and Chief Investment Officer, Larry Whistler, was quoted in this weekend’s edition of Barron’s in Chris Dieterich’s article, “International-Focus ETFs Beat U.S. Counterparts.”  In the article, Dieterich highlights the recent trend of investors pulling assets out of U.S. stock ETFs and putting assets into international stock ETFs.  Nottingham’s own Larry Whistler summed up the shift with, “investors are starting to get reallocated.”

Not only does Dieterich highlight this shift, he also contends that it is actually warranted based on fundamentals.  According to the author, while the S&P 500’s CAPE (cyclically adjusted price/earnings) ratio of 27 is well above its median of 16, the same metric for the rest of the developed world averages just 17, below its median of almost 23.  In fact, we made a similar call back in February, urging investors to maintain a more global mandate amidst attractive international valuations and shifting economic dynamics.

Thus far, investors have not been disappointed as Dieterich highlights the performance of international equities through the first part of 2015.  Investors with direct exposure to both Japan and Europe have been well rewarded as ETFs tracking the two regions have handily outperformed the +3.46% gained by SPDR’s S&P 500 ETF.

ETF Blog Post 4272015

In the article, Larry also provides an option for those investors looking for a more diversified approach.  He mentions one of Nottingham’s current holdings, the Powershares FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-US ETF (PXF), a fund that owns stocks from both Japan and Europe and weights them on the basis of certain fundamentals.

Only time will tell if 2015 serves as the year that international developed equities returned to favor, but Dieterich’s article has some compelling points.  For those of you that are interested, the entire article can be found here.  For those of you that still prefer the time-honored delivery method of paper print, the article is located on page 34 of the April 27th, 2015 edition.

Below please find the link to the Nottingham Advisors Chart Book.  This is our internal chart book aimed at providing a wide variety of graphs and illustrations related to various domestic and international macroeconomic data points.  As always, feedback on our publications is always welcome.  If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact our office.

Chart Book Q1 2015 

Chris Hugar explores a surprising way to play rising U.S. rates by utilizing a currently unloved asset class. To read more click here.

Happy New Year everyone! From the entire Nottingham team, we hope that your 2015 is off to a great start. Here at Nottingham, the start of the new year brings about something that we believe is one of the most important parts of the investment management process: year-end reviews. As a firm that prides itself on both transparency and client service, we enjoy the opportunity to sit down and catch up with our clients, but also share with them how their portfolios performed. It’s also a good time for us to answer any questions that they may have.

Usually, the questions that we receive are as unique and diverse as the individuals that we serve, but occasionally we come across one that seems to be coming up in almost every review session.

Over the last month, one such question has popped up over and over again.  It is also our experience that if several of our clients are asking it, the rest of them are probably thinking it. Fortunately for us, we started this blog to have an informal way to reach our clients and share our thoughts and, for that reason, we thought we’d take the time to tackle it in its own post.

Going into several portfolio review meetings or conversations, we’ve felt very upbeat about the portfolios and their performance. The portfolios posted another positive year and we were able to successfully navigate the markets in 2014, posting strong performance relative to our benchmarks. However, after sharing this news with clients, some have looked a little disappointed. They’ve often asked:

The S&P 500 did great this year…up +14%! Why didn’t my portfolio do as well?

Now, we don’t blame clients for anchoring their expectations to the S&P 500, which is more often than not the market proxy that they are most familiar with. However, as we’ve mentioned before, it is a less-than-ideal yardstick in measuring the performance of a global multi-asset class portfolio.  The S&P 500 tracks the performance of large U.S. stocks, while the portfolios that we manage also include exposure to international stocks and bonds. Last year, while U.S. stocks did well, one of those other asset classes did not. The culprit? International stocks.

Blog_02.03.15

As you can see from the chart above, international equities diverged from U.S. equities in May and actually finished the year down -5%.

This divergence seems particularly striking this year.  We’ve managed global portfolios for more than 10 years now and this question hasn’t come up nearly as much in the past. The reason for this has been the size of the divergence in 2014. The performance gap (19%) between international and domestic equities was the widest it’s been in 16 years! No wonder the impact on portfolio performance seems so apparent. Last year was a truly unique year.

In light of this, some clients may wonder why we even own international equities in the first place. In a nutshell, investors win when they use the broadest opportunity set. However, the truth of the matter is that this only works over longer periods of time. In any given year, this exposure can serve as either a drag or a boost on the performance of a portfolio. As we found this to be a hot topic for clients this year, we did a little more research to help them better understand the issue. We looked at performance between domestic and international equities over the last 44 years to review the distribution of outperformance. During that period, U.S. stocks outperformed 21 times and international stocks outperformed 23 times. It was practically a coin flip. With no reason to believe that the future will be different from the past, this means we are just as likely to be sitting here a year from now being thankful for that “global perspective.” In fact, with valuations attractive and the economic dynamics shifting, many market participants are starting to sing the praises of international equities once again.

In closing, remember that the year-to-year gyrations amongst asset classes can be noisy; the chart below proves as much. It highlights the annual performance of different asset classes as well as the performance of a diversified portfolio combining all of them (yellow box).

Blog_02.03.15b

For any given asset class, there isn’t a discernible pattern. However, the diversified portfolio’s performance does appear to move in a consistent pattern. It doesn’t wildly jump from top to bottom. It stays in the middle, providing a smoother ride. Sure, that means that in years like 2014 when the S&P 500 ranks towards the top, a diversified portfolio might not match its performance (so called “diworsification). However, over the long-run, you can bet it will make the ride a lot more comfortable.

So for those of you that have asked it and for those of you that have thought it, hopefully this helps answer the question.

Until Next Time,

Chris Hugar, CFA

 

We’ve pulled together a collection of recent charts, which we believe provide not only a concise recap of the major market moves defining 2014, but also some of our broad views heading into 2015. Click below to view the slide deck.

Nottingham Advisors 2014 Recap 2015 Outlook

As always, please feel free to call or email us with any questions.

On December 5th, the Nottingham team volunteered at the Food 2 Families food drive.  Food 2 Families is WGRZ 2 and Tops’ annual outdoor food drive that brings out the WNY community to support local families in need. The event raised over 100,000 pounds of food and benefits over 96,000 individuals served monthly by the Food Bank of Western New York.  Click here to learn more about Food 2 Families.

Foodbank_12.05.14

 

 

 

 

 

Additionally, the Nottingham team got into the holiday spirit by purchasing gifts for the Gateway Longview Adopt-An-Angel Campaign. To learn more about the program, click here.

Gateway 1

 

 

 

 

 

Gateway 2

Subscribe to Our Publications